Philosophical Assumptions in ABA | A-2 BCBA® Sixth Edition Task List

6th edition bacb task list A.2 Philosophical Assumptions in ABA

What Are Philosophical Assumptions in Applied Behavior Analysis?

Welcome back to our 6th Edition BCBA Task List series, where we break down each task list item into essential components to help you master the BCBA exam. Today, we’re focusing on A-2: Philosophical Assumptions Underlying the Science of Behavior Analysis—the foundational principles that guide how we analyze and interpret behavior.

These assumptions also help standardize the way behavior analysts view the world, ensuring we remain technological and conceptually systematic. While individual perspectives may differ, these core principles create a shared framework for understanding behavior in a scientific and objective manner. Science is the pursuit of knowledge carried out in accordance with a set of overarching methodological principles. In Applied Behavior Analysis, we adhere to a set of principles that direct our work, including selectionism, determinism, empiricism, experimentation, replication, and parsimony.

Selectionism

Behavior is selected based on interactions with the environment, occurring at three different levels:

  • Phylogenetic Selection: Behaviors evolve over generations through natural selection (e.g., desert plants develop toxins to deter predators).
  • Ontogenetic Selection: An individual’s behavior is shaped by learning history and experiences (e.g., a child learns to raise their hand in class to get attention).
  • Cultural Selection: Behaviors are passed socially through modeling, imitation, and communication (e.g., children learn manners by observing adults).

Key Takeaway: Whether over generations or within an individual’s lifetime, behavior is shaped and selected by interactions with the environment.

Determinism

In behavior analysis, we assume that the universe is lawful and orderlybehavior does not happen randomly. Every behavior occurs because of antecedents and consequences in the environment.

Example: A client does not engage in aggression for “no reason.” Environmental factors influence behavior, and it’s the behavior analyst’s job to identify these variables.

Common Misconception: Parents or caregivers may believe behavior occurs randomly. A behavior analyst must demonstrate that behavior follows predictable patterns

Key Takeaway: We seek to understand the cause of behavior rather than assuming randomness.

Empiricism

The basis of scientific knowledge is empiricism.
Scientists acquire knowledge by unbiased observation and measurement of phenomena, free from bias and conviction. Science relies on objective data collection, not subjective opinions or assumptions. Empiricism means that all decisions should be based on direct observation and measurement. As a behavior analyst it is your job to make decisions and write treatment plans based on things you have observed.

Example: A parent claims their child “always has tantrums before bath time.” Instead of taking this at face value, a behavior analyst observes and collects data to verify whether this pattern holds true.

Why It Matters: Interviews and document reviews, or indirect measurements, are useful when analyzing behavior and behavior change, but not enough. Direct observation ensures our decisions are objective and based on what is actually occurring. We always want to use interventions that are backed by empirical research.

Key Takeaway: Behavior analysts rely on evidence, not assumptions when analyzing and modifying behavior.

Experimentation

The primary method that scientists utilize to comprehend, anticipate, and enhance events is experimentation.
To determine whether there is a functional connection between occurrences, an experiment is run.
Scientists can identify cause and effect correlations by modifying and controlling particular variables and then watching the results. In applied behavior analysis, our primary method of experimentation is single subject design.

Pragmatism

Pragmatism means that decisions should be practical and based on effectiveness, rather than personal preference or opinion. A pragmatic approach takes an objective approach to each situation and will choose the approach that is likely to produce the best results, or lead to the optimal outcome, regardless of personal feelings or subjective opinions.

  • Example: A supervisor must decide which technician should work with a high-profile client. Even if they personally prefer one technician, the decision should be based on effectiveness, not favoritism.
  • Why It Matters: Biases can interfere with effective decision-making. Behavior analysts must focus on what works best for meaningful behavior change.

Key Takeaway: Decisions should be objective and data-driven, not based on personal bias.

Parsimony

The concept of parsimony dictates that the most straightforward explanation for a phenomenon be used. In order to reduce errors and increase understanding, scientists try to explain for their observations using the simplest explanation possible. When determining the function of a behavior, or the reason the behavior is occurring, you should always start by asking yourself simple questions regarding antecedents, consequences, and setting events. Only once the simple explanations are ruled out should you start searching for more complex solutions to the problem.

Example: A student who is never late to class arrives late one day. Instead of assuming the student is rebelling, depressed, or experiencing trauma, the first question should be: Was there traffic?

Why It Matters: Overcomplicating behavior explanations can waste time and resources. Start simple before considering more complex possibilities.

Key Takeaway: Always rule out simple explanations first before considering more elaborate causes.

Philosophical Doubt

Philosophical doubt is a crucial component of science because it enables researchers to remain objective while also challenging their presumptions and beliefs. Scientists can continue to improve their understanding of the world if they are always willing to challenge their results. No matter how credible the source is, the findings should always be looked at through a skeptical eye. Even your own findings should be treated through the lens of doubt.

Example: Research on extinction procedures is evolving, with new studies exploring ways to reduce the aversive effects of extinction while maintaining effectiveness. A behavior analyst who engages in philosophical doubt is open to adapting strategies based on new findings.

Why It Matters: If behavior analysis never evolved, we would still be relying on outdated methods from the 1970s. Progress requires questioning current practices and embracing new research. It also forces you to continue to evaluate your own interventions and approach.

Key Takeaway: Always evaluate new data and be willing to adjust strategies based on scientific advancements.

Why These Assumptions Matter in Behavior Analysis

These philosophical assumptions create a scientific foundation for behavior analysis. They guide assessment, intervention, and ethical decision-making, ensuring that behavior analysts approach their work with consistency, objectivity, and effectiveness. Your assessments and treatments as a behavior analyst should be guided by the determinism, empiricism, experimentation, replication, parsimony, and philosophical doubt principles.

Learn more…

BCBA® Study Materials Available Here

RBT® Study Materials Available Here

More videos at ABA Exam Review YouTube

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *