Identify and Distinguish Between Respondent and Operant Conditioning | B-3 BCBA® Sixth Edition Task List

b3 respondent and operant conditioning

Respondent vs. Operant Conditioning in ABA: A Complete Guide

Welcome back to our BCBA Task List Series, where we break down essential Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) concepts to help you prepare for your BCBA exam and improve your professional practice.

Today, we’re covering B-3: Identify and Distinguish Between Respondent and Operant Conditioning.

While operant conditioning is central to ABA interventions, respondent conditioning plays a role in automatic, reflexive behaviors that ABA practitioners must recognize.

This guide will cover:
Definitions and key differences between respondent and operant conditioning.
How each type of conditioning works with real-world examples.
Why this concept is crucial for behavior analysis and intervention design.
Tips for mastering this topic for the BCBA exam.

By the end, you’ll be able to differentiate between these two learning processes and apply them effectively in ABA practice and on your BCBA exam.

What is Respondent Conditioning? (Classical Conditioning)

Respondent conditioning, also known as classical conditioning, is a stimulus-reflex relationship in which a neutral stimulus (NS) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) to elicit an involuntary (reflexive) response.

This process was first described by Ivan Pavlov in his famous experiment with dogs and salivation.

Key Characteristics of Respondent Conditioning:

Involuntary and automatic responses (e.g., reflexes such as blinking, salivating, sweating).
No consequences involved—learning occurs through stimulus pairing, not reinforcement or punishment.
✔ The contingency is S-R, or stimulus-reflex.

How Respondent Conditioning Works

Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) → Unconditioned Response (UCR)

  • A naturally occurring stimulus elicits a reflexive response.
  • Example: Sunlight (UCS) → Squinting (UCR)

Neutral Stimulus (NS) + Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) → Unconditioned Response (UCR)

  • A previously neutral stimulus is paired with the UCS multiple times.
  • Example: Hearing a bell (NS) + Seeing sunlight (UCS) → Squinting (UCR)

Conditioned Stimulus (CS) → Conditioned Response (CR)

  • The formerly neutral stimulus (NS) now elicits the response on its own, without the UCS.
  • Example: Hearing a bell (CS) → Squinting (CR)

Examples of Respondent Conditioning in Daily Life

  • Smelling food (UCS) → Salivating (UCR)
  • Hearing a song associated with a breakup (CS) → Crying (CR)
  • A dog hears a knock on the door (CS) → Starts to growl

📌 Key Exam Tip: Respondent behaviors are elicited (not evoked) and are considered reflexes

What is Operant Conditioning? (Skinnerian Conditoning)

Operant conditioning, also known as instrumental conditioning, is a learning process where behavior is strengthened or weakened based through consequences. This concept was developed by B.F. Skinner, who identified how reinforcement and punishment shape voluntary behavior. This is our primary behavior change method in applied behavior analysis.

Key Characteristics of Operant Conditioning:

Behavior is shaped by consequences (reinforcement or punishment or extinction).
Voluntary behavior is evoked, not elicited.
Operant behaviors are learned and shaped, not reflexive.
Reinforcement increases behavior; punishment and extinction decrease behavior.

How Operant Conditioning Works

A-B-C Contingency (Three-Term Contingency)

  • Antecedent (A): The event or stimulus before the behavior.
  • Behavior (B): The response performed by the individual.
  • Consequence (C): What follows the behavior (reinforcement or punishment or extinction).

Consequences Affect Future Behavior

  • Reinforcement (increases future behavior)
    • Positive reinforcement: Adding something desirable.
    • Negative reinforcement: Removing something aversive.
  • Punishment (decreases future behavior)
    • Positive punishment: Adding something aversive.
    • Negative punishment: Removing something desirable.

Examples of Operant Conditioning in Daily Life

  • A student completes homework → Teacher gives praise → Increased likelihood of completing homework in the future.
  • A child touches a hot stove → Feels pain → Less likely to touch the stove again.
  • A worker receives a bonus for meeting sales goals → Continues working hard.

📌 Key Exam Tip: Operant behaviors are evoked, not elicited, and rely on consequences to determine future occurrence.

Key Differences: Respondent vs. Operant Conditioning

Feature Respondent Conditioning (Classical) Operant Conditioning
Discovered By Ivan Pavlov B.F. Skinner
Type of Behavior Reflexive (automatic, involuntary) Voluntary (learned)
Response is… Elicited by a stimulus Evoked by a consequence
Role of Consequences No consequences involved Reinforcement or punishment shapes behavior
Example A dog salivates at the sound of a bell A child gets a sticker for completing homework

Why Conditioning Matters in Applied Behavior Analysis

Understanding reflexive behaviors (respondent) vs. learned behaviors (operant) is essential for behavior assessment and intervention creation
ABA interventions focus primarily on operant conditioning but must account for respondent behaviors in certain situations (e.g., phobias, anxiety, conditioned emotional responses).

ABA Example: Addressing a Fear Response

🔹 Scenario: A child is afraid of dogs due to a past experience.
🔹 Respondent Conditioning: The sight of a dog (CS) elicits sweating (CR) due to prior pairing with a frightening event.
🔹 Operant Conditioning: The child avoids dogs which avoids sweating, reinforcing avoidance behavior.
🔹 Intervention: Systematic desensitization (gradual exposure + reinforcement) can help break the conditioned fear response.

Final Thoughts: Mastering Respondent & Operant Conditioning

  • Respondent conditioning involves involuntary reflexes learned through pairing (stimulus-reflex relationship).
  • Operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors shaped by reinforcement or punishment (S-R-S contingency).
  • Respondent behaviors are elicited, while operant behaviors are evoked.
  • ABA interventions primarily use operant conditioning but must account for respondent behaviors when necessary.

Practice Exam Question:

Which of the following is an example of operant conditioning?
A. A dog salivates at the sound of a bell.

B. A child jumps when they hear a loud noise.

C. A student receives a gold star for completing math problems and begins completing more math problems.

D. A person blinks when a bright light shines in their eyes.

Correct Answer: C. A student receives a gold star for completing math problems and begins completing more math problems.

Stay tuned for more BCBA Task List breakdowns!

🔹 Subscribe to ABA Exam Review Youtube for weekly BCBA and RBT study videos!
🔹 Explore Study Materials: BehaviorAnalystStudy.com – BCBA
btexamreview.com – RBT
🔹 Celebrate Your Success: Let us know when you pass your exam for our Sunday Shoutouts!

Work hard, study hard, and see you soon!